1 AIT Asian Institute of Technology

Project evaluation through an option valuation approach and selection policies for RDA project portfolio investment

AuthorAngsumalin Senjuntichai
Call NumberAIT Diss. no.ISE-12-06
Subject(s)Investments--Decision making

NoteA dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Industrial Engineering and Management, School of Engineering and Technology
PublisherAsian Institute of Technology
Series StatementDissertation ; no. ISE-12-06
AbstractThis research aims to improve the valuation process for the individual project investment problem and the selection process for the project portfolio investment problem in three stages: research (R), development (D) and acquisition (A). The proposed valuation model is developed to help evaluate an individual RDA project investment based on the option valuation approach by incorporating more practical decision alternatives, namely, the chance to sell the patent and the ability to postpone the start of a project. With these two additional decision alternatives, the firms have more managerial flexibility which brings more true value to the RDA project. The decision for the investment in the RDA project is then made based on more reliable and practical method. In this research, not only technical but also market uncertainties are taken into consideration in the valuation process of the technical stages, i.e., research and development stages. Both unce1tainties affect the investment decision in contradicting ways. Technical unce1tainty makes the investment in the research and development stages more attractive, while market uncertainty makes it less attractive as the option value of postponement increases. However, under the situation of high market unce1tainty, instead of abandoning the project since the beginning of the technical stages, the postponement decision keeps the option to invest in the project later alive. It was confirmed through simulated experiments that there exists a very high chance that the postponement decision can turn into the decision to invest. The patent option was also comparatively analyzed with the decision to invest. The simulated results did confirm the significance of the chance to sell the patent as a safer decision under the situation of high market uncertainty. In addition, it has been founded that a sh01ter term of patent agreement significantly helps to improve the advantage of the patent sales over the immediate investment. With regard to the RDA project p01tfolio selection problem when the budget is limited, this research confirmed that not all of the projects which have been evaluated to be optimal to invest will be selected. Instead, these projects have to be compared with each other. Traditionally, when a project has been rejected, it is rejected or abandoned forever since the beginning. Likewise, the projects that were evaluated to be optimal to lll postpone will be rejected forever from the portfolio. However, from option perspective proposed in this research, these projects should only be rejected temporarily and should be given a chance to be reconsidered. In this research, three investment policies, i.e., patent, switch and postponement policies, are proposed based on option approach for selection process of the sequential RDA project portfolio investment problem subject to a budget constraint in which the projects are assumed to be independent. The performance under each policy for different amounts of available budget derived through Monte Carlo simulation indicated that the proposed policies would help improve the efficiency of the limited budget by keeping the investment opportunity of the postponed and good rejected projects alive instead of abandoning them since the beginning. It can be concluded that each proposed policy is useful in a specific situation. In details, when there exists budget left from investing in all good projects, i.e., in the projects with the optimal decision to invest, the postponement policy suggests to reconsider the postponed projects with high technical unce1iainty in the future. However, when the available budget is not enough for all good projects, the switch policy suggests considering the good rejected projects again in the next period in parallel with the running projects since there is an option to invest in such projects later due to the possibility of technical failure occurrence in the running projects. In addition, if the switch policy is not applicable in case that the planned budget of the failed running projects is not enough to switch to any good rejected project, there is an option to invest for the patent sale at the end of the research or development stage in such projects by employing partial budget allocation scheme ..
Year2012
Corresponding Series Added EntryAsian Institute of Technology. Dissertation ; no. ISE-12-06
TypeDissertation
SchoolSchool of Engineering and Technology (SET)
DepartmentDepartment of Industrial Systems Engineering (DISE)
Academic Program/FoSIndustrial Systems Engineering (ISE)
Chairperson(s)Huynh Trung Luong;
Examination Committee(s)Voratas Kachitvichyanukul ;Vatcharaporn Esichaikul ;Wang, Gary
Scholarship Donor(s)Royal Thai Government;
DegreeThesis (Ph. D.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 2012


Usage Metrics
View Detail0
Read PDF0
Download PDF0